Skip to main content

Canucks free agency, 2018

It's six am. I'm still flummoxed by the recent free agent signings by the Canucks, nearly two full weeks later. Two fourth liners signed for four years. One for $3 million, and the other for $3.25 million. Fourth liners. Four years. Both for $3 million or more per year.
Ah well. It ain't my money.
But still, one would think the Canucks front office would have someone to tell management that maybe signing two players for term who are likely to begin slowing down sooner rather than later at this stage in their careers probably isn't a good idea.
Didn't they learn with Dorsett? With Prust? Gritty fourth liners don't last long playing into their thirties -heck, even into their late twenties- just because of the style of play that got them to where they are is high risk.
Honestly, it's just bad business. The Canucks had the luxury of waiting through the summer before picking up the phone to bring a veteran leader or two. Canucks management could've, and probably, should've waited free agency out.
PTO's probably should've been the route the Canucks went down. Work the prospects out in training camp, and bring in some veteran talent then. There's no rush. Bring in leadership if there's a sense of unease in training camp.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chris Higgins, waived.

He'll be bought out, according to Elliote Friedman. Higgins (VAN) on waivers for purpose of buyout — Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 27, 2016 He was a good player in his prime. Not a top level talent, but he could do a little of everything. And he was a fantastic penalty killer, too. But he's lost half a step, and the lack of NHL level talent depth at the Canucks' centre position really killed Higgins' play. There's still some play left in his bones, and he's had some time to rest up for the coming season. A playoff team should give him a chance in their bottom six. Or a rebuilding team would be happy to have him and his experience in their organization.
Post a Comment
Read more

Penguins Forced to Trade Kessel to Keep Malkin

The Hockey Writers Kessel's definitely on the wrong side of thirty now. He's probably going to end up much like Vanek: playing contract to contract. Not a bad end to a career, but still. The writer to this piece did sneak in what seems like Penguins side-talking to justify the trade. I honestly dislike that. Just thank the player, and move on. There shouldn't be any need to drag names through the mud. Diplomacy is an art, and a necessity.
Post a Comment
Read more

Canucks sign forward Micheal Ferland to four-year deal

Sportsnet Odd to see this guy in a Canucks uniform, but he's not a terrible player. The term and value isn't bad, but this new contract places the Canucks under pressure to find a way to sign Boeser. A long-term contract for Boeser is probably out for now. It may be something short-term, unless the Canucks find cap space by sending out a draft pick or prospect along with a bad contract. Does Ferland make the Canucks better? Well, he moves the needle a little: In analysis, he'll do well in a second or third line role. He's being paid for that level too, so it's a good contract. However, the Canucks are really doing things backwards here. Boeser's contract should've been priority number one. Then the team should've brought in role players such as Ferland. Update: NMC for the first two years. Yeah, dunno why the Canucks gave him that. If he wanted that, the Canucks should've driven down his salary further then. But NMC's should really be ...
Post a Comment
Read more