Skip to main content

The poor philosophy of the Canucks: rant

In all honesty, I'm fairly ambivalent about the choice for the Canucks first round pick, this year. In fact, I'm a bit hesitant.
Juolevi may, and, in fact, probably will become a fine defense-men
However, let's disregard what Juolevi may become, and concentrate on whom the Canucks didn't pick. They didn't pick Tkachuk, who was the consensus number five, overall, on most draft lists.
Whether he'll become a star like his father before him is also unimportant, at this moment.
As of this moment, Tkachuk was the best player available at number five. It's a simple argument. He's a forward, and we can guess at a forward's potential much more easily than we can a defense-man's. He scored metric tonnes in junior. He's a known commodity.
Defense-men, on the other hand, are becoming a bit voodoo in the first round. We may or not get a player who'll play up to his potential. But that's unimportant, right now.
Instead, let us consider the Canucks' philosophy in choosing Juolevi instead of Tkachuk. The Canucks needed defensive prospects. They'd been broadcasting this for some time, now. Teams knew what the Canucks wanted from this draft.
The Canucks wanted a d-man, because they felt they needed one.
But let's be honest, here. The Canucks were in serious need of pretty much everything. They don't actually have the luxury of picking and choosing what they want from a draft. They didn't have any extra first round picks. They didn't have any second round picks.
In all honesty, they don't actually even have any decent young players in their system NHL ready aside from Horvat, and perhaps Virtanen, if he steps up his offense next season. There's holes throughout their lineup, and the players the Canucks have signed to fill them are a ragtag bunch. Over-rated misfits and castoffs from other teams, in many cases which the Canucks oddly enough have paid premium price for.
There's not a whole lot there, right now.
And yet the Canucks entered into this draft clearly intent on spending their pick on a d-man who could have perhaps been had later in the round. It's their highest draft pick in years, and they reached on the consensus pick. And even if Juolevi had gone in the next pick, it was still a reach. There was a clear top five, and the Canucks chose the sixth best prospect.
The Canucks finished third last in the NHL, this past season. They don't have the luxury of picking and choosing at the NHL Entry Draft. They should instead be in desperation mode, drafting as many young players at all positions as possible.
Drafting Tkachuk gives the Canucks options. There's perhaps teams below the Canucks who have vested interest in drafting him, even at the risk of losing an extra pick or two.
However, due to Benning's overt broadcasting of what he was going to do, the teams below the Canucks can afford to gamble that perhaps Tkachuk may fall to them. And even if he doesn't, it should still shake up the draft order.
And even if the Canucks don't trade Tkachuk, they still drafted the best player available at the fifth spot. They could then focus on their next pick, without worrying over the left wing.
In all honesty, a team should be built with flexibility in mind at all positions. That should include the GM.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Casual Canuck

Casual Canuck is a place for  a casual commentary regarding the Vancouver Canucks, specifically, and the NHL, generally. I, personally, am Troy Thomas. I am somewhat a traditional writer with gonzo instincts.

Canucks acquire Erik Gudbranson, 2016 5th for McCann, 2016 2nd, 2016 4th

Awful trade. Jared McCann was coming off an underwhelming rookie season, but it looked as though he had some pretty decent upside. He's a first round draft pick, and seemed quite a steal at his position. Erik Gudbranson, on the other hand, was a defender on the Panthers who appeared out of his depth on the Panther's first pairing. He's twenty-four years old. He's never scored more than fifteen points in five seasons. He is what he is, and what that is is a third pairing defender miscast as a defensive specialist, when in fact his defense is merely average. McCann for Gudbranson would be a bad trade. McCann and a second round draft pick is an awful trade. McCann, a second, and a fourth for Gudbranson and a fifth is laughably awful. The Canucks had serious need for a top four defenseman, but they didn't fill this need trading for Gudbranson. He can't score. He can't handle the puck. The Canucks were in desperate need for a playmaking defender. Gudbranson i...

Canucks at Coyotes: L4-3

Cross-posted at HFBoards Chalk this game up to the hockey gods, I guess. As someone on the Coyotes board said, they're bad at everything, including losing. Canucks probably would've won this game, were it not for weird puck bounces that landed onto Coyote players sticks in scoring positions, all game long. Canucks outshot the Coyotes, outplayed them, outhustled them, and out and out lost to them, in spite of all that. This was a weird, weird game. How many times in his career has Luke Schenn potted a goal from behind the net on his backhand? Pretty odd place for a noted stay-at-home defence-man to be scoring goals from. Edler had the highest Corsi +/- at 14, and yet was on the ice for the most egregious, fluky GA. Miller makes the save on a harmless shot from the point, trying to blocker the puck to the corner, but it bounces off the boards onto the other side of the net right onto Vrbata's stick for an open net goal. And the Canucks then give up two P...