Skip to main content

The poor philosophy of the Canucks: rant

In all honesty, I'm fairly ambivalent about the choice for the Canucks first round pick, this year. In fact, I'm a bit hesitant.
Juolevi may, and, in fact, probably will become a fine defense-men
However, let's disregard what Juolevi may become, and concentrate on whom the Canucks didn't pick. They didn't pick Tkachuk, who was the consensus number five, overall, on most draft lists.
Whether he'll become a star like his father before him is also unimportant, at this moment.
As of this moment, Tkachuk was the best player available at number five. It's a simple argument. He's a forward, and we can guess at a forward's potential much more easily than we can a defense-man's. He scored metric tonnes in junior. He's a known commodity.
Defense-men, on the other hand, are becoming a bit voodoo in the first round. We may or not get a player who'll play up to his potential. But that's unimportant, right now.
Instead, let us consider the Canucks' philosophy in choosing Juolevi instead of Tkachuk. The Canucks needed defensive prospects. They'd been broadcasting this for some time, now. Teams knew what the Canucks wanted from this draft.
The Canucks wanted a d-man, because they felt they needed one.
But let's be honest, here. The Canucks were in serious need of pretty much everything. They don't actually have the luxury of picking and choosing what they want from a draft. They didn't have any extra first round picks. They didn't have any second round picks.
In all honesty, they don't actually even have any decent young players in their system NHL ready aside from Horvat, and perhaps Virtanen, if he steps up his offense next season. There's holes throughout their lineup, and the players the Canucks have signed to fill them are a ragtag bunch. Over-rated misfits and castoffs from other teams, in many cases which the Canucks oddly enough have paid premium price for.
There's not a whole lot there, right now.
And yet the Canucks entered into this draft clearly intent on spending their pick on a d-man who could have perhaps been had later in the round. It's their highest draft pick in years, and they reached on the consensus pick. And even if Juolevi had gone in the next pick, it was still a reach. There was a clear top five, and the Canucks chose the sixth best prospect.
The Canucks finished third last in the NHL, this past season. They don't have the luxury of picking and choosing at the NHL Entry Draft. They should instead be in desperation mode, drafting as many young players at all positions as possible.
Drafting Tkachuk gives the Canucks options. There's perhaps teams below the Canucks who have vested interest in drafting him, even at the risk of losing an extra pick or two.
However, due to Benning's overt broadcasting of what he was going to do, the teams below the Canucks can afford to gamble that perhaps Tkachuk may fall to them. And even if he doesn't, it should still shake up the draft order.
And even if the Canucks don't trade Tkachuk, they still drafted the best player available at the fifth spot. They could then focus on their next pick, without worrying over the left wing.
In all honesty, a team should be built with flexibility in mind at all positions. That should include the GM.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Canucks free agency, 2018

It's six am. I'm still flummoxed by the recent free agent signings by the Canucks, nearly two full weeks later. Two fourth liners signed for four years. One for $3 million, and the other for $3.25 million. Fourth liners. Four years. Both for $3 million or more per year. Ah well. It ain't my money. But still, one would think the Canucks front office would have someone to tell management that maybe signing two players for term who are likely to begin slowing down sooner rather than later at this stage in their careers probably isn't a good idea. Didn't they learn with Dorsett? With Prust? Gritty fourth liners don't last long playing into their thirties -heck, even into their late twenties- just because of the style of play that got them to where they are is high risk. Honestly, it's just bad business. The Canucks had the luxury of waiting through the summer before picking up the phone to bring a veteran leader or two. Canucks management coul...

Penguins Forced to Trade Kessel to Keep Malkin

The Hockey Writers Kessel's definitely on the wrong side of thirty now. He's probably going to end up much like Vanek: playing contract to contract. Not a bad end to a career, but still. The writer to this piece did sneak in what seems like Penguins side-talking to justify the trade. I honestly dislike that. Just thank the player, and move on. There shouldn't be any need to drag names through the mud. Diplomacy is an art, and a necessity.