Skip to main content

The poor philosophy of the Canucks: rant

In all honesty, I'm fairly ambivalent about the choice for the Canucks first round pick, this year. In fact, I'm a bit hesitant.
Juolevi may, and, in fact, probably will become a fine defense-men
However, let's disregard what Juolevi may become, and concentrate on whom the Canucks didn't pick. They didn't pick Tkachuk, who was the consensus number five, overall, on most draft lists.
Whether he'll become a star like his father before him is also unimportant, at this moment.
As of this moment, Tkachuk was the best player available at number five. It's a simple argument. He's a forward, and we can guess at a forward's potential much more easily than we can a defense-man's. He scored metric tonnes in junior. He's a known commodity.
Defense-men, on the other hand, are becoming a bit voodoo in the first round. We may or not get a player who'll play up to his potential. But that's unimportant, right now.
Instead, let us consider the Canucks' philosophy in choosing Juolevi instead of Tkachuk. The Canucks needed defensive prospects. They'd been broadcasting this for some time, now. Teams knew what the Canucks wanted from this draft.
The Canucks wanted a d-man, because they felt they needed one.
But let's be honest, here. The Canucks were in serious need of pretty much everything. They don't actually have the luxury of picking and choosing what they want from a draft. They didn't have any extra first round picks. They didn't have any second round picks.
In all honesty, they don't actually even have any decent young players in their system NHL ready aside from Horvat, and perhaps Virtanen, if he steps up his offense next season. There's holes throughout their lineup, and the players the Canucks have signed to fill them are a ragtag bunch. Over-rated misfits and castoffs from other teams, in many cases which the Canucks oddly enough have paid premium price for.
There's not a whole lot there, right now.
And yet the Canucks entered into this draft clearly intent on spending their pick on a d-man who could have perhaps been had later in the round. It's their highest draft pick in years, and they reached on the consensus pick. And even if Juolevi had gone in the next pick, it was still a reach. There was a clear top five, and the Canucks chose the sixth best prospect.
The Canucks finished third last in the NHL, this past season. They don't have the luxury of picking and choosing at the NHL Entry Draft. They should instead be in desperation mode, drafting as many young players at all positions as possible.
Drafting Tkachuk gives the Canucks options. There's perhaps teams below the Canucks who have vested interest in drafting him, even at the risk of losing an extra pick or two.
However, due to Benning's overt broadcasting of what he was going to do, the teams below the Canucks can afford to gamble that perhaps Tkachuk may fall to them. And even if he doesn't, it should still shake up the draft order.
And even if the Canucks don't trade Tkachuk, they still drafted the best player available at the fifth spot. They could then focus on their next pick, without worrying over the left wing.
In all honesty, a team should be built with flexibility in mind at all positions. That should include the GM.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Canucks sign forward Micheal Ferland to four-year deal

Sportsnet Odd to see this guy in a Canucks uniform, but he's not a terrible player. The term and value isn't bad, but this new contract places the Canucks under pressure to find a way to sign Boeser. A long-term contract for Boeser is probably out for now. It may be something short-term, unless the Canucks find cap space by sending out a draft pick or prospect along with a bad contract. Does Ferland make the Canucks better? Well, he moves the needle a little: In analysis, he'll do well in a second or third line role. He's being paid for that level too, so it's a good contract. However, the Canucks are really doing things backwards here. Boeser's contract should've been priority number one. Then the team should've brought in role players such as Ferland. Update: NMC for the first two years. Yeah, dunno why the Canucks gave him that. If he wanted that, the Canucks should've driven down his salary further then. But NMC's should really be ...

Welcome to Casual Canuck

Casual Canuck is a place for  a casual commentary regarding the Vancouver Canucks, specifically, and the NHL, generally. I, personally, am Troy Thomas. I am somewhat a traditional writer with gonzo instincts.

Canucks vs Blue Jackets: OTL 4-3

Well, the Canucks didn't show up for the first two periods, hardly doing a thing, getting down 2-0. They did show up in the third period, and tied the game, 3-3, with the goalie pulled to send the game into overtime. Was there anything worth noting? The Canucks were over-matched, outworked, and outplayed for the most part. Although he scored on the power-play, Sutter's continued deployment on it does continue to baffle. He's terrible at zone entries. He's ace on odd-man rushes, but can't help in the cycle, which is a majority of the power-play. It's simply not a good fit, and is working against the Canucks, for the most part. There's better options.